206, 520 P.2d 1022.) ), The Amount due an individual claimant may vary, depending upon the date of denial or termination in his case and the conceivable event that subsequently-changed circumstances interrupted his eligibility for reasons not involving his parents' domestic situation and EAS s 41450.12. 796 at p. 801, 484 P.2d 964 at p. 969 (text at fn. Proc., Secs. CCP Section 1083 specifies that the writ of mandamus may be called a writ of mandate. . . 460, 490 P.2d 1148 (vacated and remanded, upon other grounds, Sub nom. 5). <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 13 0 R 14 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 30 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> Section 170.6, subdivision (2), provides in pertinent part that [i]f directed to the trial of a cause which has been assigned to a judge for all purposes, the motion [to disqualify the judge] shall be made to the assigned judge or to the presiding judge by a party within 10 days after notice of the all purpose assignment (Emphasis added.). At that hearing, counsel for father may have waived the 30day time limit for hearing the petition.2 The next hearing was set for September 12, 1996. 797, 525 P.2d 701), the equities of this situation are also to be considered. "[1], A peremptory writ of mandate "is distinguished from an alternative writ of mandate (mandamus), which orders the governmental agency, court or officials to obey the order or show cause at a hearing why it should not. It is clear that the statutory scheme and the rules supporting the statutes require that petitions under section 300 be heard and decided rapidly. The courts of this state have consistently applied the debt theory conceived in the Board of Social Welfare decision, and the entitlement to retroactive payment of public assistance benefits which follows from it. hbbd```b``"@$3V `2LH`v$ fKH@H2]{"_o_|@jD.HN)G,=.a`=/ $Mm County Counsel informed the clerk of this court by telephone that no response to the petition would be filed. Law and justice. ), It is therefore clear that but One essential fact is to be pursued by appellant with respect to each class member who claims retroactive AFDC benefits pursuant to the amended judgment: i.e., whether he or she had been denied benefits Solely by virtue of EAS s 41450.12 or, as stated in the Order Certifying Class, by virtue of EAS s 41450.12 solely because .

How Does Friction Affect A Race Car Positively And Negatively, Articles P